The Use of Drones for Innovative Seismic Acquisition: A Change of Paradigm for HSE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The use of drones in the oil and gas industry is still relatively recent, and is currently unlocking new methods and approaches of geophysical acquisition and subsurface imaging. METIS®, a disruptive and integrated research project, employs the use of drones to perform an innovative 3D high density geophysical acquisition, that targets hard-to-access acreage. The benefits associated with the use of drones are easily recognized: an increased efficiency, fewer man hours, reduced HSE risks, and a lower environmental footprint. However a number of new safety, security, regulatory, and public perception issues are raised and need to be better understood before the use of drones can become standard practice. The acceptability of drones and a new method to assess the risks associated to METIS® drone operations is investigated. This study presents how the use of drones is changing the HSE risks associated with an onshore geophysical acquisition, but also how this technology brings new solutions to reduce them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it