MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2932023531 · doi:10.31980/mosharafa.v7i3.26

Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek dalam Materi Statistika Kelas VIII Sekolah Menengah Pertama

2018· article· id· W2932023531 on OpenAlex
Iyam Maryati

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMosharafa Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMathematics educationComputer sciencePsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstrakArtikel ini merupakan studi literatur yang betujuan untuk mendeskripsikan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek yang diterapkan dalam materi statistika pada siswa kelas VIII Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Dalam artikel ini juga menyajikan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) sebagai alternatif dalam pelaksanaan pembelajaran. Berdasarkan telaah literatur dari penelitian yang relevan diperoleh kemampuan lierasi dan penalaran statistis baik siswa SMP maupun SMA masih dalam kategori rendah. Hal ini terjadi karena sangat dipengaruhi oleh model pembelajaran yang diterapkan. Dalam model pembelajaran berbasis proyek ini guru diberikan kesempatan untuk melakukan pembelajaran yang melibatkan kerja proyek. Hasil akhir dari kerja proyek tersebut dapat berupa laporan dan presestasi. Adapun penilaian tugas proyek diawali dari proses perencanaan, pelaksanaan, dan akhir tugas proyek. Oleh karena itu model pembelajaran berbasis proyek dapat dijadikan sebagai salah satu alternatif dalam pembelajaran. Abstract (Conducting Project Based Learning in Statistics of 8th Grade Junior High School Students)This article is a literature study which aims to describe the Project-Based Learning Model that is applied in statistical material for students of grade VIII of junior high school. In this article also presents a Learning Implementation Plan (RPP) as an alternative in the implementation of learning. Based on the review of literature from relevant research, it was found that the ability and statistical statistics of junior and senior high schools were still in the low category. This happens because very much the text by the learning model is applied. In the learning, project, development, development and development models. The end result of the work can be in the form of reports and presentations. Arrange the work done from the project planning, implementation and final project. Therefore, project-based learning models can be used as an alternative in learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it