MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2932023531 · doi:10.31980/mosharafa.v7i3.26

Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek dalam Materi Statistika Kelas VIII Sekolah Menengah Pertama

2018· article· id· W2932023531 on OpenAlexaff
Iyam Maryati

Bibliographic record

VenueMosharafa Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMathematics educationComputer sciencePsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstrakArtikel ini merupakan studi literatur yang betujuan untuk mendeskripsikan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek yang diterapkan dalam materi statistika pada siswa kelas VIII Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Dalam artikel ini juga menyajikan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) sebagai alternatif dalam pelaksanaan pembelajaran. Berdasarkan telaah literatur dari penelitian yang relevan diperoleh kemampuan lierasi dan penalaran statistis baik siswa SMP maupun SMA masih dalam kategori rendah. Hal ini terjadi karena sangat dipengaruhi oleh model pembelajaran yang diterapkan. Dalam model pembelajaran berbasis proyek ini guru diberikan kesempatan untuk melakukan pembelajaran yang melibatkan kerja proyek. Hasil akhir dari kerja proyek tersebut dapat berupa laporan dan presestasi. Adapun penilaian tugas proyek diawali dari proses perencanaan, pelaksanaan, dan akhir tugas proyek. Oleh karena itu model pembelajaran berbasis proyek dapat dijadikan sebagai salah satu alternatif dalam pembelajaran. Abstract (Conducting Project Based Learning in Statistics of 8th Grade Junior High School Students)This article is a literature study which aims to describe the Project-Based Learning Model that is applied in statistical material for students of grade VIII of junior high school. In this article also presents a Learning Implementation Plan (RPP) as an alternative in the implementation of learning. Based on the review of literature from relevant research, it was found that the ability and statistical statistics of junior and senior high schools were still in the low category. This happens because very much the text by the learning model is applied. In the learning, project, development, development and development models. The end result of the work can be in the form of reports and presentations. Arrange the work done from the project planning, implementation and final project. Therefore, project-based learning models can be used as an alternative in learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMosharafa Jurnal Pendidikan MatematikaSame topicMathematics Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207