Graphical Processing Unit-Accelerated Open-Source Particle Image Velocimetry Software for High Performance Computing Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Particle image velocimetry (PIV) data processing time can constrain data set size and limit the types of statistical analyses performed. General purpose graphics processing unit (GPGPU) computing can accelerate PIV data processing allowing for larger datasets and accompanying higher order statistical analyses. However, this has not been widespread likely due to limited accessibility to the GPU-PIV hardware and software. Most GPU-PIV software is platform dependent and proprietary, which restricts the computing systems that can be used and makes the details of the algorithm unknown. This work highlights the development of an open-source, cross-platform, GPU-accelerated, PIV algorithm. Validation of the algorithm is done using both synthetic and experimental images. The algorithm was found to accurately resolve the time-averaged flow, instantaneous velocity fluctuations, and vortices. All data processing was done on a GPU supercomputing cluster and notably outperformed the central processing unit version of the software by a factor of 175. The algorithm is freely available and included in the OpenPIV distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.240 | 0.090 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".