MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2932806918 · doi:10.1353/jcr.2014.0004

Images, Relics, and Legends: The Formation and Transformation of Buddhist Sacred Sites ed. by James Benn, Jinhua Chen, James Robson (review)

2014· article· en· W2932806918 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chinese Religions · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonourHonorSpace (punctuation)Argument (complex analysis)BuddhismPhilosophyArt historyHistoryClassicsSociologyTheologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BOOK REVIEWS JAMES BENN, JINHUA CHEN, and JAMES ROBSON, eds., Images, Relics, and Legends: The Formation and Transformation of Buddhist Sacred Sites (Essays in Honour of Professor Koichi Shinohara). Oakville, Ontario: Mosaic Press, 2012. xxv, 334 pp. CAN/US$34.95, £22.95, J25.95 (pb). ISBN 978-0-88962-909-7 The study of sacred space and sites has come a long way from Mircea Eliade’s irruption of the sacred or Rudolf Otto’s ‘‘wholly other.’’ Thanks in no small part to Henri Lefebvre’s tripartite conceptualization of space (spatial practice, representations of space, representational spaces), and to scholars of religion such as David Chidester and Edward Linenthal, to name just a few, our understandings of sacred space now must include a strong material component, a more interdisciplinary approach, and an acknowledgement of sociopolitical factors at work in and around any given site. Benn, Chen, and Robson’s edited volume gets us a lot closer to this. The essays in this volume take seriously Lefebvre’s argument that social space is a social product embodying social relationships and it behooves us to determine those relationships. This wonderful book—wonderful because of the range, complexity, and depth of its essays—is a Festschrift in honor of Professor Koichi Shinohara of Yale University, whose career has spanned several decades and whose publications cover a remarkable breadth of topics (as listed in the biographical sketch at the beginning of the book by Jinhua Chen), including his research on hagiography and monastic biography in medieval China. Professor Shinohara is perhaps most well known for his work on Daoxuan 道宣 (596–667) and Daoshi 道世 (596?–668z), though, as Chen points out, Shinohara’s work also covers miracle stories, sacred sites, images, and so forth.1 This collection of essays stems from a conference held at the University of British Columbia in October 2004. Given the level and complexity of research in the essays, this is a book for specialists and not for general readership. The volume begins with a biographical sketch by Chen Jinhua, who lists all the major publications by Professor Shinohara (and there are many!). This is followed by an excellent introduction by James Robson, who captures the essence of each of the subsequent fourteen essays. (Readers would do well to look at Robson’s 1 See for example, Koichi Shinohara, ‘‘The Moment of Death in Daoxuan’s Vinaya Commentary,’’ in The Buddhist Dead, ed. Jacqueline I. Stone and Brian Cuevas (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2007), 105-133; Speaking of Monks: Essays on Religious Biographies in Asia, with Phyllis Granoff (Oakville, Ontario, New York, London: Mosaic Press, 1992); and ‘‘Evolution of Chan Biographies of Eminent Monks,’’ Bulletin de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient 85 (1998): 305-324, to list just a few. In the biographical sketch provided at the beginning of Images, Relics, and Legends, Jinhua Chen lists four pages of bibliography by Koichi Shinohara. Journal of Chinese Religions, 42. 1, 100–142, May 2014 # Society for the Study of Chinese Religions 2014 DOI: 10.1179/0737769X14Z.00000000010 Introduction for more details than I will provide here on each essay.) Robson quickly takes us to a turning point of sorts established by Professor Shinohara with regards to Buddhist sacred geography when he (Shinohara) ponders how new Buddhist sacred sites are created so far away from the historical sites directly associated with the Buddha in India. To put this more bluntly: how do Buddhists construct, maintain, and reproduce sacred geographies? Putting aside for the moment the question as to what one might mean by the term ‘‘sacred,’’ the importance of Professor Shinohara’s question and subsequent research demonstrates the importance of cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary approaches in trying to understand the production of sacred space. We see this in the first essay of the volume by Professor Shinohara in which he explores how a utopic space (borrowing from Jonathan Z. Smith’s useful binary— locative and utopian space) becomes a physical sacred site that attracts pilgrims. Shinohara employs a visionary monastery as a utopian place and then explores what function this had in medieval Chinese Buddhism. According to the stories, the Northern Qi monk Yuantong 圓通 (d...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it