MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2932806918 · doi:10.1353/jcr.2014.0004

Images, Relics, and Legends: The Formation and Transformation of Buddhist Sacred Sites ed. by James Benn, Jinhua Chen, James Robson (review)

2014· article· en· W2932806918 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Chinese Religions · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueChinese history and philosophy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHonourHonorSpace (punctuation)Argument (complex analysis)BuddhismPhilosophyArt historyHistoryClassicsSociologyTheologyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BOOK REVIEWS JAMES BENN, JINHUA CHEN, and JAMES ROBSON, eds., Images, Relics, and Legends: The Formation and Transformation of Buddhist Sacred Sites (Essays in Honour of Professor Koichi Shinohara). Oakville, Ontario: Mosaic Press, 2012. xxv, 334 pp. CAN/US$34.95, £22.95, J25.95 (pb). ISBN 978-0-88962-909-7 The study of sacred space and sites has come a long way from Mircea Eliade’s irruption of the sacred or Rudolf Otto’s ‘‘wholly other.’’ Thanks in no small part to Henri Lefebvre’s tripartite conceptualization of space (spatial practice, representations of space, representational spaces), and to scholars of religion such as David Chidester and Edward Linenthal, to name just a few, our understandings of sacred space now must include a strong material component, a more interdisciplinary approach, and an acknowledgement of sociopolitical factors at work in and around any given site. Benn, Chen, and Robson’s edited volume gets us a lot closer to this. The essays in this volume take seriously Lefebvre’s argument that social space is a social product embodying social relationships and it behooves us to determine those relationships. This wonderful book—wonderful because of the range, complexity, and depth of its essays—is a Festschrift in honor of Professor Koichi Shinohara of Yale University, whose career has spanned several decades and whose publications cover a remarkable breadth of topics (as listed in the biographical sketch at the beginning of the book by Jinhua Chen), including his research on hagiography and monastic biography in medieval China. Professor Shinohara is perhaps most well known for his work on Daoxuan 道宣 (596–667) and Daoshi 道世 (596?–668z), though, as Chen points out, Shinohara’s work also covers miracle stories, sacred sites, images, and so forth.1 This collection of essays stems from a conference held at the University of British Columbia in October 2004. Given the level and complexity of research in the essays, this is a book for specialists and not for general readership. The volume begins with a biographical sketch by Chen Jinhua, who lists all the major publications by Professor Shinohara (and there are many!). This is followed by an excellent introduction by James Robson, who captures the essence of each of the subsequent fourteen essays. (Readers would do well to look at Robson’s 1 See for example, Koichi Shinohara, ‘‘The Moment of Death in Daoxuan’s Vinaya Commentary,’’ in The Buddhist Dead, ed. Jacqueline I. Stone and Brian Cuevas (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2007), 105-133; Speaking of Monks: Essays on Religious Biographies in Asia, with Phyllis Granoff (Oakville, Ontario, New York, London: Mosaic Press, 1992); and ‘‘Evolution of Chan Biographies of Eminent Monks,’’ Bulletin de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient 85 (1998): 305-324, to list just a few. In the biographical sketch provided at the beginning of Images, Relics, and Legends, Jinhua Chen lists four pages of bibliography by Koichi Shinohara. Journal of Chinese Religions, 42. 1, 100–142, May 2014 # Society for the Study of Chinese Religions 2014 DOI: 10.1179/0737769X14Z.00000000010 Introduction for more details than I will provide here on each essay.) Robson quickly takes us to a turning point of sorts established by Professor Shinohara with regards to Buddhist sacred geography when he (Shinohara) ponders how new Buddhist sacred sites are created so far away from the historical sites directly associated with the Buddha in India. To put this more bluntly: how do Buddhists construct, maintain, and reproduce sacred geographies? Putting aside for the moment the question as to what one might mean by the term ‘‘sacred,’’ the importance of Professor Shinohara’s question and subsequent research demonstrates the importance of cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary approaches in trying to understand the production of sacred space. We see this in the first essay of the volume by Professor Shinohara in which he explores how a utopic space (borrowing from Jonathan Z. Smith’s useful binary— locative and utopian space) becomes a physical sacred site that attracts pilgrims. Shinohara employs a visionary monastery as a utopian place and then explores what function this had in medieval Chinese Buddhism. According to the stories, the Northern Qi monk Yuantong 圓通 (d...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,302
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,361

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,258 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle