Effect of Current on the First-Order Spectral Power of High-Frequency Radar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wave-current interaction is a common and important phenomenon in the ocean. As an ocean remote sensing tool, high-frequency (HF) radar can be used to measure currents and wave parameters. In this paper, the possibility of studying wave-current interaction using HF radar is investigated. The first-order spectral power (FSP) of HF radar is used to explore the effect of current on the Bragg wave. By analyzing the FSP change with current (FSP-current distribution), we find that, in deep water, the wave-current interactions mainly belong to 2-D refraction case, while, over a relatively shallow shelf, the interactions are stronger and more complicated. Based on local topography and current field data at Taiwan Strait, the simulation results obtained using the SWAN model confirm the 2-D refraction of the Bragg wave. When the wave-current interaction is stable, we compensate the FSP with radar-measured currents according to the radar extracted FSP-current distribution and achieve a more accurate wind estimation. Comparisons between the original and refined wind fields show the effectiveness and necessity of the current-based compensation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".