IDENTIDADE NA APRENDIZAGEM DE LÍNGUAS IDENTITY IN LANGUAGE LEARNING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
NORTON, Bonny. Identity and language learning: extending the conversation. 2.ed. rev. e aum. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2013. 216 p. O livro Identity and language learning: extending the conversation (2013) constitui uma obra seminal em Linguistica Aplicada, fruto das pesquisas de Bonny Norton, professora e pesquisadora da Universidade de British Columbia, Canada. Assim como o subtitulo indica, o proposito da obra e ampliar o dialogo iniciado com a publicacao de Identity and language learning (2000). Embora o objetivo da autora nao tenha sido o de reescrever o livro, a nova edicao contem o acrescimo de uma extensa introducao na qual se detalha e atualiza a literatura sobre identidade e aprendizagem de linguas apos mais de uma decada de intensas pesquisas. Alem disso, tambem ha a adicao de um posfacio, deveras abrangente e perspicaz, escrito pela renomada linguista Claire Kramsch...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".