MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2932960048 · doi:10.2118/193914-ms

A Comprehensive Adaptive Forecasting Framework for Optimum Field Development Planning

2019· article· en· W2932960048 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Salehi, Gill Hetz, Feyisayo Olalotiti, Nadav Sorek, Hamed Darabi, David Castiñeira

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Simulation Conference · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGridStreamlines, streaklines, and pathlinesSensitivity (control systems)WorkflowInversion (geology)Reservoir simulationField (mathematics)Data miningInfillReplicateProcess (computing)Mathematical optimizationIndustrial engineeringEngineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An integral aspect of smart reservoir management of oil and gas fields is the process of identifying and performance forecasting of the remaining, feasible, and actionable field development opportunities (FDOs). In the present work, we introduce an adaptive full-physics simulation-based forecasting framework that applies a series of cutting-edge technologies to provide short- and long-term forecasts for both field- and well-level performance. Our workflow can be applied to a comprehensive opportunities inventory including behind-pipe recompletion, infill drilling, and sidetrack opportunities. In our approach, we begin with a model order reduction technique, which involves a parsimonious elimination of redundancies existing in a given geologic model. This involves an adaptive model upscaling strategy that retains fine details in the vicinity of critical geological features by locally varying the resulting model grid resolution. Reduced models, which are validated using streamline-based flow metrics, are passed into an automated sensitivity study and model calibration engine for efficient reconciliation of observed production trends in the field. Here, we apply a recently proposed Ensemble Smoother robust Levenberg- Marquardt (ES-rLM) method to generate plausible model realizations that replicate the reservoir energy. Representative models are further improved in a sensitivity-based local inversion step to match multiphase production data at the well level. An approach alternative to streamlines, which is compliant with a general unstructured grid format, is utilized to directly compute production data sensitivities on the underlying grid in the local inversion module. Finally, calibrated models are directly passed to the optimization and forecasting engine to assess and optimize field opportunities and development scenarios. This framework has been successfully applied to several giant mature assets in the Middle East, North America, and South America. A case study for one of the giant reservoirs in Latin America is presented where hundreds of field development opportunities are initially identified. We then apply our forecasting framework to the various scenarios including all opportunities to deliver the optimum field development plan. We propose a systematic workflow for field-scale modeling and optimization using an adaptive framework. Our approach facilitates a flexible framework to rapidly generate reliable forecasts and quantify associated uncertainties in a robust manner. This advantage in flexibility and robustness is tied to our fast and automated two-stage model calibration module that leads to substantial savings in computational time. This makes it an efficient method for quantifying the uncertainty as demonstrated through improved estimation of the faults’ connectivity, permeability distribution, fluid saturation evolution, and swept volume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Reservoir Simulation ConferenceSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207