Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to show how elite schooling systems in Egypt are a space where inequality is reproduced and reified. This paper aims to combine existing research on elite schooling in Egypt and beyond with the theoretical underpinnings of Pierre Bourdieu’s notions of capital and habitus to depict the ways in which elite schools in Egypt form behavioural attributes that differentiate attendees of public schools from those of private elite schools in a way that disadvantages the former and retains power for the latter. Apart from economic capital, other forms of symbolic capital, such as linguistic, cultural, educational, and social is gained through elite schools in Egypt. Children of the elite, who gain access to international schools from what can mostly be described as inherited and inscribed capital become what I will call “global cultural omnivores.” By being global culture omnivores, these students are able to compete at a higher level than their public school counterparts in the local and international fields. Research into the problematic structures of elite schooling can show where some of the emergences of inequality in Egypt, and how it continues to be perpetuated through-out time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".