Views Across the Decks of HMS Ophir: Revisiting the 1901 Imperial Royal Tour
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article takes a fresh look at the 1901 royal tour of the British Empire by the future George V and Queen Mary on HMS Ophir. This tour has been examined by several scholars, who have tended to concentrate on a single individual dominion, i.e., Australia, Canada, New Zealand, or South Africa. Discussion has focused on local responses to the tour, and in particular to the royal couple. This article, in contrast, considers the tour as a single, global voyage, which involved more sea days than port days. It also moves beyond the royal couple to include the passengers and crew of both HMS Ophir and the accompanying British warships. By exploring a variety of individual shipboard accounts, in particular the illustrated journal of Petty Officer Harry Price and the published tour volume of Assistant Press Secretary Donald McKenzie Wallace, along with the personal diaries of the royal couple and an accompanying journalist’s description, the article explores the various, overlapping meanings of the tour for its diverse participants. In turn, it helps to clarify the class, gender, and imperial dimensions of both the royal tour and the British world c.1901.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".