MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2933333364 · doi:10.33751/pedagog.v2i1.743

STANDAR SARANA PRASARANA LABORATORIUM IPA SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS DI WILAYAH BOGOR

2018· article· en· W2933333364 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePedagonal Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Research and Methods
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationSMA*FacilitationData collectionSample (material)PsychologyMedical educationEngineeringComputer scienceMathematicsMedicinePhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACTFacilitation in education is something that can support teaching learning process at school. Laboratory is one of the important facilitation because the lab is a place where students can practice their skill through demonstration, experiment, and development of knowledge. The aim of this research is to know the availability of science laboratories in public high school and private high school in Bogor and compared it with minister regulation No. 24 year 2007. Descriptive method is used in this research with five schools chosen randomly as sample. Data collection techniques used in this research is observation and interview. The result of the finding shows that judging from five schools that has been observed which are SMA Al-Nur, SMA PGRI 4, SMAN 7, SMAN 4 and SMA PGRI 4 they are all not qualified with the minister regulation No.24 year 2007 about standard issue facilitation of high school laboratory which requires 2.4 m2 wide per student.Keyword: Senior High School, Laboratories, Facilitation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it