MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2933333364 · doi:10.33751/pedagog.v2i1.743

STANDAR SARANA PRASARANA LABORATORIUM IPA SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS DI WILAYAH BOGOR

2018· article· en· W2933333364 on OpenAlexaff
Munarti Munarti, Susi Sutjihati

Bibliographic record

VenuePedagonal Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Research and Methods
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationSMA*FacilitationData collectionSample (material)PsychologyMedical educationEngineeringComputer scienceMathematicsMedicinePhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACTFacilitation in education is something that can support teaching learning process at school. Laboratory is one of the important facilitation because the lab is a place where students can practice their skill through demonstration, experiment, and development of knowledge. The aim of this research is to know the availability of science laboratories in public high school and private high school in Bogor and compared it with minister regulation No. 24 year 2007. Descriptive method is used in this research with five schools chosen randomly as sample. Data collection techniques used in this research is observation and interview. The result of the finding shows that judging from five schools that has been observed which are SMA Al-Nur, SMA PGRI 4, SMAN 7, SMAN 4 and SMA PGRI 4 they are all not qualified with the minister regulation No.24 year 2007 about standard issue facilitation of high school laboratory which requires 2.4 m2 wide per student.Keyword: Senior High School, Laboratories, Facilitation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePedagonal Jurnal Ilmiah PendidikanSame topicEducational Research and MethodsFrench-language works237,207