MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2934019964 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2019.01.001

Myocarditis and Eosinophilia: Three Cases of Hypereosinophilic Syndrome and Myocarditis

2019· article· en· W2934019964 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael Chiu, Nakul Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Open · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaRockyview General HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsHypereosinophilic syndromeMedicineMyocarditisEosinophiliaBiopsyAutopsyCardiomyopathyInternal medicineEosinophilicCardiologyPathologyHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eosinophilic infiltration is a rare and underrecognized cause of myocarditis associated with prolonged eosinophilia. Before advanced imaging and routine biopsy, patients were diagnosed with an idiopathic cardiomyopathy with subsequent diagnosis made on autopsy. We present 3 cases of eosinophilic myocarditis diagnosed by cardiac biopsy classified as hypereosinophilic syndrome. Two patients presented with severe left ventricular dysfunction, and 1 patient presented with cardioembolic stroke. All patients were successfully treated with glucocorticoid therapy. Our cases highlight the importance of early diagnosis with endomyocardial biopsy and prompt immunosuppressive treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC OpenSame topicEosinophilic Disorders and SyndromesFrench-language works237,207