MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2934066533 · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000001232

DICER1 and FOXL2 Mutation Status Correlates With Clinicopathologic Features in Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumors

2019· article· en· W2934066533 on OpenAlexafffund
Anthony N. Karnezis, Yemin Wang, Jacqueline Keul, Basile Tessier‐Cloutier, Jamie Magrill, Stefan Kommoss, Janine Senz, Winnie Yang, Lily Proctor, Dietmar Schmidt, Philip B. Clement, C. Blake Gilks, David G. Huntsman, Friedrich Kommoss

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaTerry Fox Research Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMutationBiologyImmunohistochemistryInternal medicinePathologyCancer researchMedicineGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (SLCTs) are rare ovarian sex cord-stromal neoplasms. The only known recurrent genetic abnormality is DICER1 mutation, with rare mutations reported in FOXL2. We set out to establish a molecular classifier using DICER1 and FOXL2 somatic mutation status and clinicopathologic features in 42 SLCTs. Five tumors (12%) were well differentiated, 31 (74%) moderately differentiated, and 6 (14%) poorly differentiated. Eight (19%) had heterologous elements, and 2 (5%) showed retiform differentiation; all 10 were moderately differentiated. DICER1 RNase IIIb domain mutations were identified in 18/41 (44%; 17 moderately, 1 poorly differentiated), including all cases with retiform or heterologous elements. FOXL2 c.402C>G (p.C134W) mutation was identified in 8/42 (19%) tumors (5 moderately, 3 poorly differentiated). DICER1 and FOXL2 mutations were mutually exclusive. Median age for the cohort was 47 years (range, 15 to 90 y). Patients with DICER1 mutations were younger (median, 24.5 y; range, 15 to 62 y) than patients with FOXL2 mutation (median, 79.5 y; range, 51 to 90 y) (P<0.0001). Nine of 10 tumors with retiform or heterologous elements occurred in premenopausal patients (median, 26.5 y; range, 15 to 57 y). Patients with tumors that were wild type for DICER1 and FOXL2 (15/42, 37%) had an intermediate age (median, 51 y; range, 17 to 74 y). All tumors were FOXL2 positive by immunohistochemistry. Patients with FOXL2 mutation trended toward presenting more often with abnormal bleeding (P=0.13); DICER1-mutant patients trended toward having more androgenic symptoms (P=0.22). Our data suggest at least 3 molecular subtypes of SLCT with distinct clinicopathologic features: DICER1 mutant (younger, more androgenic symptoms, moderately/poorly differentiated, retiform or heterologous elements), FOXL2 mutant (postmenopausal, abnormal bleeding, moderately/poorly differentiated, no retiform or heterologous elements), and DICER1/FOXL2 wild type (intermediate age, no retiform or heterologous elements, including all well-differentiated tumors).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Surgical PathologySame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207