Narrativas de sofrimento emocional na Atenção Primária: contribuições para uma abordagem integral culturalmente sensível em Saúde Mental Global
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autores da Saúde Mental Global defendem, de um lado, o aumento do acesso aos cuidados de saúde mental, inclusive com o uso de intervenções padronizadas. De outro lado, na Atenção Primária à Saúde no Brasil, a apresentação sintomatológica do sofrimento emocional pelos pacientes dificulta sua identificação pelos profissionais, comprometendo o cuidado e exigindo uma abordagem culturalmente sensível. Objetivando conhecer a percepção de pacientes sobre o sofrimento emocional e seu cuidado na Atenção Primária, adotou-se método qualitativo de abordagem narrativa, com coleta de dados em grupos em salas de espera e roteiro baseado no instrumento McGill Ilness Narrative Interview. As narrativas foram tratadas por Análise de Conteúdo e revelaram que limitar a comunicação do sofrimento é negar o acesso ao cuidado. Contrapondo tal limitação, apontaram-se estratégias para nortear a estruturação de um cuidado que seja integral e culturalmente sensível.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".