Efficacy of an experimental 3% potassium nitrate mouthwash in providing long-term relief from dentin hypersensitivity: An 8-week randomized controlled study (Study 2).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of an experimental mouthwash containing 3% potassium nitrate (KNO3) in the relief of dentin hypersensitivity when used as an adjunct to brushing with fluoride toothpaste compared with the use of the same toothpaste alone. METHODS: This was a randomized, two-treatment, examiner-blind, parallel-design single-center, 8-week study in healthy subjects with self-reported and clinically diagnosed dentin hypersensitivity. Subjects were randomized to receive either fluoride toothpaste plus 3.0% KNO₂ mouthwash or the same fluoride toothpaste alone, and instructed to use their allocated treatment twice daily for the next 8 weeks. Dentin hypersensitivity was evaluated at baseline and following 4 and 8 weeks of treatment through assessment of responses to evaporative (air) and tactile stimuli [measured by the Schiff sensitivity scale/a visual rating scale (VRS) and tactile threshold, respectively], and using the Dentin Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ, a validated quality-of-life instrument for dentin hyper-sensitivity). RESULTS: A total of 135 subjects were randomized and all completed the study. Both treatment groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in sensitivity from baseline for each clinical measure of sensitivity (P< 0.0001) at Week 4 and Week 8. The toothpaste plus mouthwash group showed greater reductions in sensitivity at both timepoints for all clinical measures; between-treatment differences were only statistically significant for responses to an evaporative (air) stimulus (Schiff sensitivity score and VRS) at Week 4. There was evidence of an improvement in dentin hypersensitivity-associated quality of life as measured by changes from baseline in several DHEQ parameters for both treatment groups, but there were no statistically significant differences between treatments. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Although in the current study adjunctive use of a 3% KNO₂ mouthwash did not provide statistically significant improvements in dentin hypersensitivity for all clinical measures at all timepoints compared with use of fluoride toothpaste alone, the reductions in sensitivity observed in this study are compatible with the findings of a previous study that showed adjunctive use of a 3% KNO₂ mouthwash to be effective in providing relief from dentin hypersensitivity after 8 weeks' twice-daily use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".