Anatomy, possible sexual dimorphism, and phylogenetic affinities of a new mylodontine sloth from the late Pleistocene of intertropical Brazil
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glossotherium phoenesis sp. nov. from the late Pleistocene of intertropical Brazil is described and compared with Glossotherium robustum and Glossotherium tropicorum. Compared to these two species, the main differences occur in the shape of the nasal region and pterygoids, proportionate narrowing of the skull, length and arrangement of the tooth rows, degree of projection and form of the mandibular symphysis, height at various points along the dentary, and proportions of the radius, among others described. Clear differences in two well-preserved skulls of the new species are interpreted as representing sexual dimorphism, as occurs in other ground sloths such as Paramylodon and Eremotherium. Other notable features are described for osteoderms and for the ontogenetic developments of the mandible and dentition. The new species G. phoenesis appears to be one of the most derived Mylodontidae, sister taxon of G. tropicorum, and closely related to Pleurolestodon.http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3F1BAFDB-FC4A-442E-ADFD-692EB2DC7655
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it