Mutagenesis computer experiments in pentameric ligand-gated ion channels: the role of simulation tools with different resolution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs) are an important class of widely expressed membrane neuroreceptors, which play a crucial role in fast synaptic communications and are involved in several neurological conditions. They are activated by the binding of neurotransmitters, which trigger the transmission of an electrical signal via facilitated ion flux. They can also be activated, inhibited or modulated by a number of drugs. Mutagenesis electrophysiology experiments, with natural or unnatural amino acids, have provided a large body of functional data that, together with emerging structural information from X-ray spectroscopy and cryo-electron microscopy, are helping unravel the complex working mechanisms of these neuroreceptors. Computer simulations are complementing these mutagenesis experiments, with insights at various levels of accuracy and resolution. Here, we review how a selection of computational tools, including first principles methods, classical molecular dynamics and enhanced sampling techniques, are contributing to construct a picture of how pLGICs function and can be pharmacologically targeted to treat the disorders they are responsible for.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it