MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936000114

The Central Bank and the government throughout the last quarter of the 20th century: the case of Argentina

2012· preprint· en· W2936000114 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hernán Gil Forleo

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2012
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Theory and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertibilityCurrency boardCentral bankCurrencyEconomicsMonetary reformQuarter (Canadian coin)LiberalizationDebtFinancial systemInternational economicsGovernment debtGovernment (linguistics)Openness to experienceMonetary economicsMonetary policyInterest rateFinanceMarket economyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Since the depletion of the schemes of nationalization of deposits (1977), to the end of the Currency Board and the Second External Debt (2002), the Central Bank of Argentina periodically changed their functions, instruments and targets of monetary policy, being a key player in the adjustment plans (Australito & Primavera), and stabilization programmes (Tablita) and economic growth (Austral), unilateral trade and financial openness (Currency Board), varying degree of dependence on the government decisions. The purpose of this work is to determinate the participation and evaluate the performance of the Central Bank in the last quarter of the twentieth century: In the first section we will analyse the transition from and scheme of nationalization of deposits to a Free Banking System guaranteed by the government (The Tablita), the second section develop the attempts to stabilize prices and outputs under the first debt crisis, while the third section corresponds to the Central Bank’s role in the scheme of unilateral liberalization and the fixed exchange rate (The Convertibility Plan)."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsSame topicEconomic Theory and PolicyFrench-language works237,207