MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W293600896

NATO Task Group on Information Fusion

2004· article· en· W293600896 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDefense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Strategy and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTask (project management)Task groupVariety (cybernetics)Group (periodic table)Military intelligenceSample (material)Computer scienceBusiness intelligenceComputer securityOperations researchPolitical scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineeringKnowledge managementManagementEngineering managementLawEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Task Group on Information Fusion (TgonIF) is a task group affiliated to the NATO Research Technology Organisation (RTO) / Information Systems Technology (IST) Panel. The task group is addressing the importance and difficulty of fusing the always increasing variety and quantity of information produced by the full spectrum of sensors and sources during the ever changing type of military operations. The first part of this report is a slightly updated version of the official status report made by the chairman of the task group, Gaetan Thibault from DRDC (Valcartier), Canada, and presented at the 9th IST Panel Business meeting taking place 30-31 May 2002 in Estoril Portugal. The second part is a sample of examples taken from a course in Intelligence for OOTW given by WO1 Dave Steer, Defence Intelligence and Security Centre, Chicksands, UK. All names and references in these examples have been changed for security reasons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it