MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936089133 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbz022.055

14.2 INDIVIDUALIZED IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF FIRST-EPISODE DRUG-NAÏVE SCHIZOPHRENIA USING BRAIN FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY: FROM SMALL TO BIG DATA

2019· article· en· W2936089133 on OpenAlexaff
Bo Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)RisperidoneAntipsychoticMedicineDrug-naïveCohortPsychiatryConfoundingDiagnosis of schizophreniaInternal medicinePsychologyPsychosisDrug

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia during the first episode without the confounding effects of treatment has been challenging. Leveraging these biomarkers to establish diagnosis and make individualized predictions of future treatment responses to antipsychotics would be of great value, but there has been limited progress. Applying machine learning algorithms, such as LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator), support vector machines (SVM) and deep neural networks, to brain imaging data is a promising approach to provide individualized identification of schizophrenia and prediction of treatment outcome, because the algorithms may capture the complex patterns within the imaging data as objective biomarkers for the disorder. In this study, we aim to investigate biomarkers in first-episode drug-naïve (FEDN) schizophrenia, identify the FEDN schizophrenia patients and predict their responses to antipsychotic treatment at an individual level using machine learning. In this prospective cohort study, FEDN schizophrenia patients and healthy controls were recruited at a baseline time point, and the patients were treated with risperidone for 10 weeks. The patients with FEDN schizophrenia were inpatients (N=43; Age 28.3±9.9 years; 24 females). Healthy controls (HC) were recruited from the community (N=29; Age 27.7±7.8 years; 16 females). Patients subjects were only included if they were diagnosed with schizophrenia during their first psychotic episode using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Subjects were excluded if they had a history of taking psychiatric medication, head trauma with residual effects, neurological disorders, and uncontrolled major medical conditions. HC were excluded if they had a history of any Axis I disorder according to SCID, had a first-degree relative with any Axis I disorder, or used psychoactive medication less than two-weeks before the study. The functional connections (FC) were derived using the mutual information and the correlations between the blood-oxygen-level dependent signals of the superior temporal cortex and other cortical regions acquired with the resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. The individualized identification and treatment response prediction were performed only using the data from the baseline. Cross-validated balanced accuracy of FEDN identification and correlation of predicted and actual symptom alleviation were considered as the main outcomes. We successfully identified the first-episode drug-naïve (FEDN) schizophrenia patients (balanced accuracy: 78.6%) and predicted their responses to antipsychotic treatment (r=0.69; p<0.0001; balanced accuracy for predicting responders and non-responders 82.5%). We also found that the mutual information and correlation FC was informative in identifying individual FEDN schizophrenia and prediction of treatment response, respectively. The methods and findings in this study could provide a critical step towards individualized identification and treatment response prediction in first-episode drug-naïve schizophrenia, which could complement other biomarkers in the development of precision medicine approaches for this severe mental disorder. We will discuss why further validation of such a preliminary study on large samples will be necessary and how we could link small data to big data. The potential benefits and challenges of machine learning studies in psychiatry based on the “big data” will be also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207