MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936093421

Performance, feminism and affect in Neoliberal Times [Book Review]

2018· article· en· W2936093421 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J Woollard

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminismSociologyPerformance studiesAffect (linguistics)PublishingGender studiesProject commissioningMedia studiesPolitical scienceAnthropologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Performance, Feminism and Affect in Neoliberal Times, co-edited by Australian scholar Denise Varney, comes out of collaborations formed through the Feminist Research Working Group of the International Federation of Theatre Research. The book is divided into five parts and contains twenty-three chapters by feminist performance studies scholars from Australia, Brazil, Canada, India, Japan, Korea, Sweden, United Kingdom, USA, as well as a chapter from Chilean artist and scholar, Maria Jose Contreras Lorenzini. Denise Varney, Sarah French and Sandra D’Urso are the three Australian scholars featured in this publication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207