MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936127254 · doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2019.04.005

PCSK9 inhibition in patients with and without prior myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke: A pooled analysis of nine randomized-controlled studies of alirocumab

2019· article· en· W2936127254 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Éric Bruckert, Dean J. Kereiakes, Michael Koren, Michael J. Louie, Alexia Letierce, Kathryn Miller, Christopher P. Cannon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of clinical lipidology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSanofi PasteurManitoba Beekeepers' AssociationRegeneron Pharmaceuticals
KeywordsMedicineAlirocumabInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionCardiologyPCSK9Stroke (engine)Randomized controlled trialIschemic strokeIschemiaCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

•Analysis of alirocumab ODYSSEY trials by MI/ischemic stroke status (with/without).•Alirocumab reduced LDL-C in patients with or without MI/ischemic stroke.•Alirocumab reduced lipoprotein(a) regardless of MI/ischemic stroke status.•Most patients with/without prior MI/ischemic stroke attained LDL-C goals.•Alirocumab's safety profile was generally similar regardless of prior MI/ischemic stroke. BackgroundPatients with prior cardiovascular events are at very high risk of recurrent events and may benefit from low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering beyond that achieved with maximally tolerated statins.ObjectiveTo assess potential differences between the efficacy and safety of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor, alirocumab, in patients with vs without prior myocardial infarction (MI)/ischemic stroke.MethodsData (n = 4880) were pooled from nine ODYSSEY phase 3 trials of alirocumab 75/150 mg or 150 mg every 2 weeks, mostly on background statins ± other lipid-lowering therapies. Analyses were performed according to statin status, alirocumab dose, and control (placebo or ezetimibe).ResultsBaseline LDL-C, non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels were lower and lipoprotein(a) higher in patients with than without prior MI/ischemic stroke. LDL-C levels were reduced from baseline to week 24 in patients with (51.1%–62.9%) and without (43.6%–58.3%) prior MI/ischemic stroke, with no significant interaction between prior MI/ischemic stroke status and LDL-C–lowering efficacy of alirocumab vs controls. Alirocumab significantly reduced other lipid/lipoproteins (including lipoprotein[a]) similarly in patients with/without MI/ischemic stroke. Week 24 LDL-C goal attainment rates for subgroups with/without prior MI/ischemic stroke on background statins were 74.1%–84.8% and 63.7%–74.7%, respectively. The safety profile of alirocumab was generally similar regardless of prior MI/ischemic stroke status.ConclusionsAlirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C and other atherogenic lipids/lipoproteins in patients with prior MI/ischemic stroke, and the majority of this very high cardiovascular risk population achieved LDL-C goals; efficacy and safety results were similar in patients without prior MI/ischemic stroke. Patients with prior cardiovascular events are at very high risk of recurrent events and may benefit from low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering beyond that achieved with maximally tolerated statins. To assess potential differences between the efficacy and safety of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor, alirocumab, in patients with vs without prior myocardial infarction (MI)/ischemic stroke. Data (n = 4880) were pooled from nine ODYSSEY phase 3 trials of alirocumab 75/150 mg or 150 mg every 2 weeks, mostly on background statins ± other lipid-lowering therapies. Analyses were performed according to statin status, alirocumab dose, and control (placebo or ezetimibe). Baseline LDL-C, non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels were lower and lipoprotein(a) higher in patients with than without prior MI/ischemic stroke. LDL-C levels were reduced from baseline to week 24 in patients with (51.1%–62.9%) and without (43.6%–58.3%) prior MI/ischemic stroke, with no significant interaction between prior MI/ischemic stroke status and LDL-C–lowering efficacy of alirocumab vs controls. Alirocumab significantly reduced other lipid/lipoproteins (including lipoprotein[a]) similarly in patients with/without MI/ischemic stroke. Week 24 LDL-C goal attainment rates for subgroups with/without prior MI/ischemic stroke on background statins were 74.1%–84.8% and 63.7%–74.7%, respectively. The safety profile of alirocumab was generally similar regardless of prior MI/ischemic stroke status. Alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C and other atherogenic lipids/lipoproteins in patients with prior MI/ischemic stroke, and the majority of this very high cardiovascular risk population achieved LDL-C goals; efficacy and safety results were similar in patients without prior MI/ischemic stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of clinical lipidologySame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207