MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936193458 · doi:10.3917/sigila.033.0061

Le vrai scandale de l’opéra de Chostakovitch, Lady Macbeth de Mzensk . Du succès au piège stalinien

2014· article· fr· W2936193458 on OpenAlexaff
Marie-Françoise Vieuille

Bibliographic record

VenueSigila · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsEastern Ontario Training Board
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La destinée scénique de l’opéra de Chostakovitch Lady Macbeth de Mzensk confirme l’étymologie du mot scandale : « piège, obstacle contre lequel on trébuche ». Après avoir connu de véritables triomphes, non seulement en Russie soviétique mais dans le monde entier, l’œuvre a été, deux ans après sa création en 1934, l’objet des foudres staliniennes. À partir de 1936, le compositeur renonce à composer pour la scène. Pris dans la tenaille du totalitarisme, il parvient néanmoins à élaborer une œuvre originale d’une singulière puissance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSigilaSame topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207