MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936259212 · doi:10.3917/caph1.151.0045

Identité et intensité dans l’ancienne Stoa

2018· article· fr· W2936259212 on OpenAlexaff
Lætitia Monteils-Laeng

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers philosophiques · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAugustinian Studies and Theology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’âme est pour les Stoïciens un corps pneumatique et dynamique, en interaction permanente avec le monde extérieur, elle s’en trouve modifiée de diverses manières. Dans la mesure où sa consistance morale est fonction de son degré de fermeté, sur la base de quel critère peut-on différencier les modalités psychiques moralement insignifiantes, de celles qui ont une valeur morale ? Pour répondre à cette question, on mettra en perspective les catégories stoïciennes avec les niveaux de qualification ( to poion ) décrits par Simplicius : l’état non fixe ( kinèsis ), l’état fixe non durable ( skhesis ) et l’état fixe durable, le but étant d’isoler, parmi toutes ces modifications de soi, ce qui est moralement significatif.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.025
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers philosophiquesSame topicAugustinian Studies and TheologyFrench-language works237,207