MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936259212 · doi:10.3917/caph1.151.0045

Identité et intensité dans l’ancienne Stoa

2018· article· fr· W2936259212 on OpenAlexaff
Lætitia Monteils-Laeng

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers philosophiques · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAugustinian Studies and Theology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’âme est pour les Stoïciens un corps pneumatique et dynamique, en interaction permanente avec le monde extérieur, elle s’en trouve modifiée de diverses manières. Dans la mesure où sa consistance morale est fonction de son degré de fermeté, sur la base de quel critère peut-on différencier les modalités psychiques moralement insignifiantes, de celles qui ont une valeur morale ? Pour répondre à cette question, on mettra en perspective les catégories stoïciennes avec les niveaux de qualification ( to poion ) décrits par Simplicius : l’état non fixe ( kinèsis ), l’état fixe non durable ( skhesis ) et l’état fixe durable, le but étant d’isoler, parmi toutes ces modifications de soi, ce qui est moralement significatif.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.010
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers philosophiquesSame topicAugustinian Studies and TheologyFrench-language works237,207