MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2936259981 · doi:10.5194/acp-2019-138

Atmospheric ammonia variability and link with PM formation: a case study over the Paris area

2019· article· en· W2936259981 on OpenAlexafffund
Camille Viatte, Tianze Wang, Martin Van Damme, Enrico Dammers, Frédérik Meleux, Lieven Clarisse, Mark W. Shephard, Simon Whitburn, Pierre Coheur, Karen Cady‐Pereira, Cathy Clerbaux

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesEuropean Space AgencyEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesSeasonalityClimatologyPrecipitationSulfateMeteorologyGeographyChemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The Paris megacity experiences frequent particulate matter (PM2.5, PM with a diameter less than 2.5 μm) pollution episodes in springtime (March–April). At this time of the year, large parts of the particles consist of ammonium sulfate and nitrate which are formed from ammonia (NH3) released during fertilizer spreading practices and transported from the surrounding areas to Paris. There is still limited knowledge on the emission sources around Paris, their magnitude and seasonality. Using space-borne NH3 observation records of 10-years (2008–2017) and 5-years (2013–2017) provided by the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) and the Cross-Track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) instrument, regional pattern of NH3 variabilities (seasonal and inter-annual) are derived. Observations reveal identical high seasonal variabilities with three major NH3 hot spots found from March to August. The high inter-annual variability is discussed with respect to atmospheric total precipitation and temperature. A detailed analysis of the seasonal cycle is performed using both IASI and the CrIS instrument data, together with outputs from the CHIMERE atmospheric model. For months of high NH3 concentrations (March to August) the CHIMERE model shows good correspondence with correlation slopes of 0.98 and 0.71 when comparing with IASI and CrIS, respectively. It is found that the model is only able to reproduce half of the observed atmospheric temporal NH3 variability in the domain. In term of spatial variability, the CHIMERE monthly NH3 concentrations in springtime show a slight underrepresentation over Belgium and the United-Kingdom and overrepresentation in agricultural areas in the French Brittany/Pays de la Loire and Plateau du Jura region, as well as in the north part of Switzerland. Using HYSPLIT cluster analysis of back-trajectories, we show that NH3 total columns measured in spring over Paris are enhanced when air masses are originated from the Northeast (e. g., Netherlands and Belgium), highlighting the long-range transport importance on the NH3 budget over Paris. Finally, we quantify the key meteorological parameters driving the specific conditions important for the PM2.5 formation from NH3 in the Ile-de-France region in springtime. Data-driven results based on surface PM2.5 measurements from the Airparif network and IASI NH3 observations show that a combination of the factors, e. g. a low boundary layer of ~500 m, a relatively low temperature of 5 °C and a high relative humidity of 70 %, contributes to favor PM2.5 and NH3 correlation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→