MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936371031 · doi:10.1039/c8nr09560d

The role of excitons within the hole transporting layer in quantum dot light emitting device degradation

2019· article· en· W2936371031 on OpenAlexafffund
Tyler Davidson‐Hall, Hany Aziz

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsRegional Municipality of WaterlooUniversity of Waterloo
FundersWaterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of WaterlooNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQuantum dotExcitonDegradation (telecommunications)Materials scienceOptoelectronicsLayer (electronics)NanotechnologyPhysicsCondensed matter physicsTelecommunicationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work investigates the root causes of the limited stability of electroluminescent quantum dot light-emitting devices (QDLEDs). Studies using electrical measurements, continuous UV irradiation, and both steady-state and transient photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy reveal that exciton-induced degradation of the hole transporting material (HTM) in QDLEDs plays a role in limiting their electroluminescence (EL) stability. The results indicate that there is a correlation between device EL stability and the susceptibility of the HTM to exciton-induced degradation. The presence of quenchers in the HTM layer can lead to a decrease in the luminescence quantum yield of QDs, suggesting that energy transfer between the QD and HTM films may play a role in this behavior. The results uncover a new degradation mechanism where excitons within the HTM limit the EL stability of QDLEDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscaleSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207