Par-dessus le marché ! : Réflexions critiques sur le capitalisme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La recente crise financiere mondiale a ranime un ensemble de debats sur le capitalisme et ses ravages. Depuis le sauvetage ehonte des institutions bancaires par les pouvoirs publics, de nombreux citoyens se demandent quelles sont les veritables finalites de ce modele economique. Continuer a enrichir les plus riches et laisser les inegalites sociales se creuser davantage? Un peu partout en Occident, des foules en colere ont plutot opte pour l'indignation. Par-dessus le marche! s'inscrit dans ce mouvement collectif de reflexion critique. Issus en partie des mobilisations ayant precede le sommet du G20 a Toronto, en 2010, les textes de ce recueil decryptent les multiples facettes des rapports socioeconomiques de domination et d'exploitation. Ils traitent de sujets aussi varies que le mouvement Occupy et la question des classes sociales, le role economique de l'Etat d'un point de vue anarchiste ou la logique capitaliste voilee de la poesie slam. Des questions d'hier et d'aujourd'hui pour mieux cerner la realite sociale et, ultimement, la transformer. Comme l'ecrit Francis Dupuis-Deri, « les systemes de domination actuels ne peuvent pas etre eternels ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".