Study on Cellulose-decomposed Actinomycetes in Soil in the Eastern of the Qinghai Plateau
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The distribution of cellulose–decomposed actinomycetes was studied by conventional methods. Those microbes were separated in soil from the eastern part of Qinghai Plateau. The results indicated that: There were a certain amounts of cellulose-decomposed actinomycetes in soil from the eastern part of Qinghai Plateau. The number of cellulose-decomposed actinomycetes in vegetable field soil was higher than in grain field, but the strong cellulose-decomposed actinomycetes’ ratio of cellulose-decomposed actinomycetes in vegetable field soil was lower than that in grain field. The strong cellulose-decomposed actinomycetes’ ratio of the total cellulose-decomposed actinomycetes in natural soil had certain relevance with the soil organic matter content. In each kind of natural soil, the number of cellulose-decomposed actinomycetes in cumulated irrigated soil was the maximum, and the number of strong cellulose-decomposed actinomycete in castanozem was the most, and the strong cellulose-decomposed actinomycetes’ ratio of cellulose-decomposed actinomycete in marsh soil was the highest. The results may provide scientific basis for separation and screening of the cellulose–decomposed actinomycetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".