MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936433829 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsz067.479

0481 Higher Risk Of OSA Is Associated With Poorer Affect Regulation Among The Severely Mentally Ill With A History Of Aggression: Evidence From A Forensic Setting

2019· article· en· W2936433829 on OpenAlexaff
Anik Gosselin, Celia Geck, Elliott Kyung Lee, Rébecca Robillard, Alan B. Douglass, Angela Smith, Joseph De Koninck

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpulsivityPsychiatryAnxietyPsychologyClinical psychologyObstructive sleep apneaAggressionBarratt Impulsiveness ScaleBipolar disorderEpworth Sleepiness ScaleDASSMoodMedicineApneaPolysomnographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep-related breathing disorder with negative consequences on daytime functioning, including fatigue, irritability, and poorer memory. OSA is highly prevalent among individuals diagnosed with severe mental illnesses (SMI), likely due to an accumulation of risk factors (e.g., antipsychotics, obesity, smoking). Psychiatric patients in forensic settings display greater impulsivity and emotional dysregulation compared to non-forensic psychiatric patients. We hypothesized that forensic patients at higher risk of OSA will display greater impulsivity, aggression and emotional dysregulation than forensic patients at low risk of OSA. Study participants were male (n=55) and female (n=10) forensic patients (mean age = 38.5 ±11.5). All were diagnosed with at least one SMI (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder). Participants completed the Sleep Disorders Questionnaire 2 - Sleep Apnea subscale (SDQ-2-SA) to estimate risk of OSA, followed by other self-report surveys, including: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS), Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS), Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Correlation analyses were run to examine the relationship between SDQ-2-SA scores and the scores from the surveys measuring different aspects of affect as well as sleep quality and sleepiness. Higher risk of OSA (as per the SDQ-2-SA) was positively correlated with poorer sleep (PSQI; r=0.34, p <.01); higher aggression (BPAQ, r=0.25, p <.01), higher impulsivity (BIS, r=0.35, p <.01), higher depression and anxiety (DASS, r=0.42, p <.001), and greater emotion dysregulation (DERS, r=0.36, p <.01). Higher risk of OSA was not correlated with sleepiness. While this remains to be replicated with objective PSG data, the present findings highlight that emotional dysregulation, impulsivity and aggression in forensic patients with various SMI may be worsened by OSA, a condition often undiagnosed and untreated among forensic patients. Future studies should investigate whether appropriate treatment in forensic patients with OSA may help improve emotional regulation, impulsivity and aggression, common features in many psychiatric disorders. UMRF

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207