MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936451852 · doi:10.2749/vancouver.2017.0487

Northeast Anthony Henday Drive / Yellowhead Trail System Interchange

2017· article· en· W2936451852 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueReport · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline transportPierYardCoal miningCoalBridge (graph theory)Oil refinery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>The Northeast segment of Anthony Henday drive is the final leg Edmonton’s ring road. The project was delivered on a Public-Private-Partnership (P3) basis and was opened to traffic on October 1, 2016. Yellowhead Trail (Hwy 16) is the northern leg of the TransCanada Highway and connects to Anthony Henday Drive via a three level systems interchange that required the construction of fourteen bridges including two free flowing, third level curved directional ramps. Complicating the design already challenged by the interchange geometry was the proximity to adjacent rail yards and to numerous oil refineries. The adjacent refineries require a large number of supply pipelines that restricted pier placement, with one site having 17 large diameter pipelines crossing on various alignments under a single bridge. Further complicating the site was the presence of an abandoned coal mine under two of the bridges. The challenge was to design all of these structures while accommodating these numerous constraints using a P3 delivery model where construction needed to begin prior to the completion of the final design. This paper will review the numerous design challenges that were encountered and identify the innovative solutions that were used to solve these challenges.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReportSame topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207