41 Steroid use in pediatric proliferative lupus nephritis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h3>Background</h3> Corticosteroids (CS) are the mainstay of childhood-onset lupus (cSLE) and proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) therapy. However, there are no widely accepted CS dosing regimens for LN. We aim to identify the CS treatment approaches employed by providers for newly diagnosed pediatric proliferative LN in response to common and challenging clinical scenarios. <h3>Methods</h3> Pediatric rheumatologists and nephrologists attending the 2018 Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) meeting participated in a working group addressing CS use in newly diagnosed pediatric LN. Participants responded to 3 scenarios in live polling and 12 questions of CS management in small groups. A post meeting survey was sent to each participant. <h3>Results</h3> In total, 51 physicians participated in the working group and 25 answered the survey. Of the 51 participants, 42 (82%) reported prednisone to be the oral CS of choice to treat newly diagnosed pediatric LN and 64.7% favored liquid prednisolone if swallowing pills is problematic. Once daily dosing was the preferred regimen (15/25, 60%) to help patients with adherence. Some (8/25, 32%) use a twice daily regimen for prednisone doses>2 mg/kg/day or 60 mg. A 3–4 times daily regimen was considered for hospitalized patients with severe disease manifestations by 6/25, 24%. Factors leading to the use of intravenous (IV) pulse methylprednisolone during the initial 12 months of therapy for proliferative LN varied among physicians with life-threatening extra-renal organ involvement (24/25, 96%), worsening (20/25, 80%) or slow improvement (14/25, 56%) of LN and concerns for non-adherence with oral prednisone (19/25, 76%) being the main factors. Laboratory results prompting a CS dose change are shown in table 1 (Panels A/B). Side effects such as weight gain (20/25, 80%), difficult to control blood pressure (19/25, 76%) or hyperglycemia (21/25, 84%) were reported as reasons to taper CS. In patients with inactive LN on mycophenolate mofetil, the extra-renal features that prompt an increase in CS are new/worsening neuropsychiatric disease (24/25, 96%), cardiac (23/25, 92%), or pulmonary involvement (23/25, 92%). In cases of non-adherence, all physicians would discuss reasons for non-adherence with 72% choosing to start/increase the frequency of IV steroids. Additional consensus formation results on the use of CS in pediatric proliferative LN are being developed and will be available at the time of the meeting. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Prescribed CS dosing regimens vary widely in the U.S. when used for the treatment of children with proliferative LN. Decisions on initial CS dosing regimens and subsequent management strategies remain provider dependent. <h3>Funding Source(s):</h3> None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it