MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936475662 · doi:10.1080/03066150.2019.1568246

Hybrid Realities: making a new Green Revolution for rice in south India

2019· article· en· W2936475662 on OpenAlexafffund
Marcus Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Peasant Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaIndian Council of Agricultural Research
KeywordsGreen RevolutionAgrarian societyFood securityContext (archaeology)Variety (cybernetics)Natural resource economicsBusinessEconomicsDevelopment economicsPolitical scienceAgricultureGeographyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indian policy makers and agronomists often argue that hybrid rice varieties can help raise aggregate yields to address food security and improve rural incomes. Indian farmers, however, have proved hesitant to embrace this technology. To explain the disjuncture, this paper analyses the case of a publicly developed and promoted hybrid variety in southern Karnataka. It highlights how, within the context of growing social polarisation and an increasingly water-scarce agrarian environment, many smallholders found the hybrid unsuited to cultivation strategies that increasingly sought to minimise risk. The paper therein further illustrates the limits of technological solutions to contemporary agrarian distress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.010
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Peasant StudiesSame topicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207