MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936582298 · doi:10.1109/tie.2018.2873474

Collaborative Three-Dimensional Completion of Color and Depth in a Specified Area With Superpixels

2018· article· en· W2936582298 on OpenAlexaff
Lei Fan, Long Chen, Chaoqiang Zhang, Wei Tian

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCompletion (oil and gas wells)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsComputer graphics (images)AlgorithmGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A persistent problem in the three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction technique is to eliminate blank areas in the 3-D map, which commonly emerges after removing undesired objects, such as dynamic targets or occluded areas. This task is challenging for it is difficult to acquire the coherence between color and depth information, which are both lost for each pixel in the target region. Moreover, creating novel artifacts also needs to be avoided during the completion process. To address these problems, in this paper, we propose a collaborative method to complete the lost area in the color image and its corresponding depth map. In the proposed method, an examplar-based image inpainting technique combined with planarity knowledge is adopted to iteratively repair the texture and structure information. The color completion process provides candidates for plane-fitting on segmented superpixels. The depth filling step extracts image areas requiring reinpainting, which is defined by their gradient differences. The final 3-D map can then be reconstructed from both completed color and depth images. Experiments on real-world scenes demonstrate the success of our method in the completion of 3-D maps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207