MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2936586495 · doi:10.11575/prism/21974

Reside: graduate student living in Calgary's beltline

2004· dissertation· en· W2936586495 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeremiah Jeffrey Edmonds

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical educationMathematics educationSociologyLibrary sciencePedagogyPsychologyMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The need for housing for the university student population is prevalent. As schools grow and attract more students from afar, difficulty arises in providing appropriate housing for their needs. Graduate students are a specific group within the university context, requiring living space that will address the specific needs of the demographic. Moving beyond the programmatic needs of the graduate student, the question can be asked as to how a graduate student can be given a rich living environment conducive to learning. The spirit of place for a student needs to be legible and identified with easily. A place that can be identified with has the ability to create a rich engagement, and can add to academic learning by providing more than the basic needs. Using the concept of threshold can allow a student to read the spaces that they are residing in. This project details a design for a proposed graduate student residence in Calgary's Beltline neighbourhood. Through the hierarchy of public and private spaces and thresholds, it is hoped that a student could identify with the building, allowing for a positively perceived spirit of place.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)→Same topicCanadian Policy and Governance→French-language works237,207→