Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik pada Siswa Kelas V SD
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini adalah Penelitian Pengembangan yang bertujuan untuk mengembangkanPerangkat Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Realistik pada pokok bahasan Pecahan untukSiswa Kelas V SD, yang meliputi Buku Siswa, Lembar Kegiatan Siswa, Rencana PelaksanaanPembelajaran, dan Tes Hasil Belajar. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VA SD Negeri No.2Kampung Baru Majene sebanyak 25 orang yang terdiri dari 12 orang perempuan dan 13 oranglaki-laki. Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran ini menggunakan model Thiagarajan (Model4. D) yang terdiri atas 4 (empat) tahap yaitu: pembatasan (define), perancangan (design),pengembangan (develop), dan penyebaran (disseminate). Perangkat pembelajaran matematikadengan pendekatan Realistik yang telah dikembangkan, telah divalidasi oleh pakar dan praktisidan telah diujicobakan serta mengalami revisi berulang-ulang kali sehingga didapatkan hasilyang valid, efektif, dan praktis.Kata kunci: Penelitian Pengembangan, Pendekatan Realistik, Perangkat Pembelajaran.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it