Impact of Prenatal Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressant Exposure and Maternal Mood on Physical Activity, Dietary Intake, and Markers of Adiposity at Age 6 Years
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed associations between maternal depressive symptoms, prenatal maternal antidepressant treatment, maternal estimates of child physical activity (PA), dietary total intake, and markers of adiposity. METHODS: Mothers and their children (N = 116) were part of a longitudinal cohort study examining the effects of prenatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants and maternal depression (SSRI exposed, n = 42; nonexposed, n = 74). Maternal depression symptoms were assessed prenatally and postnatally. At 6 years, PA was assessed using maternal report, 3-day dietary total intakes were obtained using objective records of intake, portion sizes, and product brand names, and birth weight, weight, height, and waist circumference (WC) at age 6 years were also collected. Body mass index (BMI) and WC z-scores standardized for sex and age were computed as markers of adiposity. RESULTS: Children with SSRI exposure had lower levels of PA than children without SSRI exposure. Total dietary energy intakes did not vary between exposure groups. SSRI exposure was not associated with BMI or WC z-scores of the children. Importantly, although lower birth weight was observed in SSRI-exposed children, differences did not remain, accounting for gestational age. CONCLUSION: Although SSRI exposure was associated with lower estimates of PA, such exposure was not associated with markers of adiposity or total diet energy intake at age 6 years. The implications across subsequent measures in childhood remain to be determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".