227 The lupus severity index accurately identifies patients with severe SLE in a multi-ethnic cohort
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h3>Background</h3> The Lupus Severity Index (LSI)<sup>1</sup> proposes to stratify patients by disease severity for clinical research. The LSI ranges from 0–10, is calculated using ACR classification criteria (ACRc) and demonstrated high predictive accuracy for severity anchored to major immunosuppressive drug use. We investigated the performance and characteristics of the LSI in a large multiethnic lupus cohort. <h3>Methods</h3> Patients from a single academic center were followed from 1990–2016 using a custom database. Records of all SLE patients were abstracted. Variables included birthdate, diagnosis date, ethnicity, ACRc, SLICC Damage Index (SDI), treatment and date of death. Ethnicity was categorized into White (WHI), Asian (ASN), Indigenous (IND), and Other. The LSI was calculated from ACRc, and compared between ethnicities and demographic variables known to be associated with severe SLE using t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient and logistic regression. <h3>Results</h3> 832 SLE patients were identified: 497 (60%) WHI; 220 (26%) IND; 91 (11%) ASN; 24 (3%) Other. Mean age was 49 years, mean disease duration 15 years, 90% female, mean age at diagnosis 35; 163 (20%) of patients had died. The mean LSI was 6.9, range 3.2–9.7. The distribution of the LSI was similar to that in the original dataset (figure 1A) and the area under the ROC curve, measured against prescription of major immunosuppressive drugs, was 0.69 (95%CI 0.65–0.73). LSI was higher in males compared to females (7.3 vs. 6.9; p-0.019), and was negatively associated with onset age (Onset <18 years LSI=7.8; 18–50 years LSI=6.8;>50 years LSI=6.6; p<0.001). LSI correlated with SDI(Pearson 0.28, p<0.001),and was a predictor of accruing any damage (SDI>1) (OR1.2 95% CI 1.1–1.3).LSI was higher in non-whites compared to whites: WHI LSI=6.6; IND LSI=7.2; Other LSI=7.3; ASN LSI 8.1; p<0.001). LSI was a predictor of early mortality (Death at age <50, or disease duration <10 years): OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.0–1.3). The distribution of the LSI varied by ethnic group with more uniformly severe disease in ASN patients (figure 1B, C) compared to WHI and IND. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Similar to the original publication, higher LSI correlated with male sex, younger onset age, and non-white ethnicity; all groups shown to have more severe SLE. LSI was also a predictor of damage and early mortality. In addition we also found the distribution of LSI to differ between ethnicities. These findings confirm the utility of the LSI in stratifying patients by severity, and supports further exploration of the LSI to investigate contributors to severe SLE. <h3>Funding Source(s):</h3> None <h3>Reference</h3> Bello GA, <i>et al. Lupus Science & Medicine</i> 2016.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it