MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936737786 · doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000000270

Patient Reported Bladder Related Symptoms and Quality of Life after Spinal Cord Injury with Different Bladder Management Strategies

2019· article· en· W2936737786 on OpenAlexaff
Jeremy B. Myers, Sara Lenherr, John T. Stoffel, Sean P. Elliott, Angela P. Presson, Chong Zhang, Jeffery Rosenbluth, Amitabh Jha, Darshan P. Patel, Blayne Welk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSpinal cord injuryTetraplegiaParaplegiaUrinary catheterizationQuality of life (healthcare)Neurogenic bladder dysfunctionClean Intermittent CatheterizationUrinary bladderCatheterSurgeryUrinary systemSpina bifidaSpinal cordInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Neurogenic bladder significantly impacts individuals after spinal cord injury. We hypothesized that there would be differences in bladder related symptoms and quality of life for 4 common bladder management methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study we measured neurogenic bladder related quality of life after spinal cord injury. Study eligibility included age 18 years or greater and acquired spinal cord injury. Bladder management was grouped as 1) clean intermittent catheterization, 2) an indwelling catheter, 3) surgery (bladder augmentation, a catheterizable channel or urinary diversion) and 4) voiding (a condom catheter, involuntary leaking or volitional voiding). The primary outcomes were the NBSS (Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score) and the SCI-QoL Difficulties (Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Measurement System Bladder Management Difficulties). Secondary outcomes were the NBSS subdomains and satisfaction with urinary function. Multivariable regression was done to establish differences between the groups, separated by level. RESULTS: Of the 1,479 participants enrolled in the study 843 (57%) had paraplegia and 894 (60%) were men. Median age was 44.9 years (IQR 34.4-54.1) and median time from injury was 11 years (IQR 5.1-22.4). Bladder management was clean intermittent catheterization in 754 cases (51%), an indwelling catheter in 271 (18%), surgery in 195 (13%) and voiding in 259 (18%). In regard to primary outcomes, in cases of paraplegia and tetraplegia an indwelling catheter and surgery were associated with fewer urinary symptoms on the NBSS compared to clean intermittent catheterization while voiding was associated with more symptoms. In paraplegia and tetraplegia cases surgery was associated with fewer bladder management difficulties according to the SCI-QoL Difficulties. In regard to secondary outcomes, surgery was associated with improved satisfaction in individuals with paraplegia or tetraplegia. CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with spinal cord injury fewer bladder symptoms were associated with an indwelling catheter and surgery, and worse bladder symptoms were noted in voiding individuals compared to those on clean intermittent catheterization. Satisfaction with the urinary system was improved after surgery compared to clean intermittent catheterization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207