MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936875796

Quality participation in parasport: Integrating evidence and community insights to develop a conceptualization of optimal parasport experiences

2017· article· en· W2936875796 on OpenAlexaff
M. Blair Evans, Celina H. Shirazipour, Veronica Allan, Mona Zanhour, Shane N. Sweet, Kathleen A. Martin Ginis, Amy E. Latimer‐Cheung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityQueen's UniversityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConceptualizationPsychologyClosenessContext (archaeology)Qualitative researchQuality (philosophy)Applied psychologySocial psychologySociologyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through parasport, adults and young athletes with physical impairments often report increases in well-being and related psychosocial perceptions compared to non-athletes. While researchers often attribute these benefits to social participation that goes-along with parasport, few existing frameworks comprehensively describe the components of optimal parasport experiences. We sought to generate an evidence-informed conceptualization of optimal parasport participation, using a view of participation across disability settings that highlights six experiential elements (Belongingness, Autonomy, Challenge, Mastery, Engagement and Meaning; Martin-Ginis, Evans, Mortenson, & Noreau, 2016). We integrated existing literature and stakeholder input within a three-phase process based on AGREE-II guideline development methods. In Phase One, we formed propositions about optimal experiences based on insights from systematic reviews and qualitative studies. In Phase Two, we developed a provisional conceptualization informed by an expert round-table and an online descriptive survey with 80 parasport athletes, parents, coaches, and administrators. In Phase Three, we refined the conceptualization using an online expert panel with researchers and sport administrators (n = 20). As a result, an initial list of quality elements grew to a conceptualization that uniquely defines the six elements in ways that represent the parasport context. We also identified 27 optimal conditions that may promote quality experiences across the physical (e.g., accessibility) and social environment (e.g., coach-athlete communication), as well as sport activities (e.g., safety). This conceptualization provides direction for future research and is a foundation that parasport organizations may apply through tools to enhance participation in their unique contexts (e.g., developing guidelines for sport programs).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.062
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0620.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0120.007
Science and technology studies0.0060.017
Scholarly communication0.0110.019
Open science0.0040.021
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.183
GPT teacher head0.504
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInclusion and Disability in Education and SportFrench-language works237,207