Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le titre de cet article suggère un rapprochement entre Theodor W. Adorno et l’utopie – une association qui est susceptible de rencontrer quelques oppositions. Néanmoins, l’utopisme joue un rôle central dans la critique sociale chez Adorno, bien qu’il puisse être opposé à toute concrétisation normative d’un futur social utopique. Afin de démontrer l’importance de l’utopie dans l’œuvre d’Adorno, la discussion fera référence à plusieurs passages ou périodes de sa pensée, et notamment ses réflexions critiques basées sur les travaux de Walter Benjamin, Thorstein Veblen, Oswald Spengler, et Aldous Huxley. Je choisis pour épigraphe un extrait de La dialectique de la raison : « Ce qui est en cause, ce n’est pas la conservation du passé, mais le rachat [ Einlösung ] des espérances du passé » 1 . C’est un extrait que je partage volontiers avec un autre auteur, dont les efforts pour refaçonner l’élément nostalgique et utopique chez Adorno méritent d’être réexaminés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".