Pola Komunikasi Kelompok Pramuka Penegak Dalam Pembinaan Karakter Patriotik Pada Kwartir Ranting Ujung Batu Kabupaten Rokan Hulu
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A group is an interaction and communication from people who have planto achieve a common goal. One of them is a communication group of scoutenforcer in coaching patriot characteristic of twig quarter Ujungbatu of RokanHulu regency. They do interaction and communication to achieveing success incoaching They do interaction and communication to achieveing success incoaching scouts in twig qwarter of Ujungbatu. The purpose of this research is tofind out the function of communication group of scout enforcer in coachingpatriot characteristic of twig quarter Ujungbatu of Rokan Hulu regency ,as wellas how to pattern of communication group of scout enforcer in coaching patriotcharacteristic of twig quarter Ujungbatu of Rokan Hulu regency.This research uses qualitative methods with descriptive approach.Subject of this research consisted of two scout couches SMK Pemdes Ujungbatu,one people council chif work the twig, and two chif support or scout leader. Datacollected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. Toachieve the validity of the data in this study, the authors used the extension ofparticipation and triangulation.The results of this reserch function communication group used in scoutcoaching is a function of social relations, education, persuasion and problemsolving. Than this communication paternt of scout enforcer twig quarterUjungbatu is done through a one way and two way, and interaction whichoccured with anyone among trainers and coaches, with using a communicationnetworks of star or all pattern shapping channe. In this case to form patriotcharacteristic of twig quarter scout Ujungbatu of Rokan Hulu regency is donethrough a implementing tri satya and dasa darma of scout.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it