MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2937054924 · doi:10.24193/subbphilo.2019.1.19

DYSTOPIC RECONFIGURATIONS OF CORPORATE AMERICA: MARGARET ATWOOD’S “THE HEART GOES LAST”

2019· article· ro· W2937054924 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Monika Koșa

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia · 2019
Typearticle
Languagero
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryArt historyMedia studiesArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dystopic Reconfigurations of Corporate America: Margaret Atwood’s “The Heart Goes Last”. One of Margaret Atwood’s dystopic novels, The Heart Goes Last is an intricate examination of human nature, the precariousness of love, free will, the roots of social evil and the potential dangers of excessive institutional power. Grounded in an examination of Atwood’s text, this paper aims to analyze the techniques through which the image of “corporate America” is re-configured in a nightmarish setting where the fight for power, money and control negatively re-positions the ethical limits of humanity. REZUMAT. Reconfigurări distopice ale Americii corporatiste în The Heart Goes Last de Margaret Atwood. Una dintre cele mai recente capodopere distopice ale autoarei Margaret Atwood, The Heart Goes Last, este o analiză plurivalentă a naturii umane, fragilitatea iubirii, voința liberă, rădăcinile răului social și potențialele pericole ale puterii instituționale excesive. Pornind de la textul atwoodian, lucrarea de față își propune să analizeze tehnicile prin care imaginea Americii corporatiste e reconfigurată într-un cadru de coșmar unde lupta pentru putere, bani și control repoziționează limitele etice ale umanității într-o categorie negativă. Cuvinte cheie: distopie, Margaret Atwood, literatură canadiană, putere, control, America corporatistă, libertate, experiment social

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai PhilologiaSame topicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionFrench-language works237,207