MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2937087566 · doi:10.1134/s1063780x19020156

Control of Coherent Structures via External Drive of the Breathing Mode

2019· article· en· W2937087566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlasma Physics Reports · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsAzimuthAxial symmetryModulation (music)PhysicsAmplitudeNonlinear systemAmplitude modulationMode (computer interface)Work (physics)OpticsFrequency modulationAcousticsRadio frequencyComputer scienceQuantum mechanicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Hall thruster exhibits two types of large-scale coherent structures: axially propagating breathing mode (m = 0) and azimuthal, with low m, typically m = 1, spoke mode. In our previous work, it was demonstrated that axial breathing mode can be controlled via the external modulations of the anode potential. Two regimes of the thruster response, linear and nonlinear, have been revealed depending on the modulation amplitude. In this work, using the high-speed camera images and developed image-processing technique, we have investigated the response of the azimuthal mode to the external modulations. We have found that, in linear regime, at low modulation voltages, axial and azimuthal structures coexist. At larger amplitudes, in the nonlinear regime, the azimuthal mode is suppressed, and only axial driven mode remains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it