MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Conundrums in Comparative Urbanism

2018· other· en· W2937256741 on OpenAlexaff
David Sadoway

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Planning and Governance
Canadian institutionsKwantlen Polytechnic University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrbanismPraxisUrbanizationUrban theoryFocus (optics)Ecological urbanismSociologyUrban studiesEconomic geographyRegional scienceGeographyEpistemologyPolitical scienceArchitectureEcologyBiologyArchaeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract How and why should we compare cities? In a world of diverse cities, what insights do comparative urbanism approaches profess to provide? This entry reviews the theory and practice of comparative urbanism (CU), including its conundrums, critiques, and potential future directions. As a postcolonial‐ and poststructuralist‐influenced approach to urban theory‐building as well as a methodological disposition, CU involves intra‐ and intercity comparisons of neighborhoods, city‐regions, and urbanization processes. Contemporary CU praxis can be understood as a relational response to understanding planetary urbanization as well as a critical counter‐reaction to “global cities” or “area studies” approaches that focus on select hierarchies of cities or regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional StudiesSame topicUrban Planning and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207