MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2937339575 · doi:10.2749/vancouver.2017.2098

Innovative Means and Methods for the New Champlain Bridge

2017· article· en· W2937339575 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gonzalo Osborne, Jeff Rogerson, Fréderic Guitard, André Mylocopos

Bibliographic record

VenueReport · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)Precast concreteEngineeringSpan (engineering)ScheduleCivil engineeringComputer scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Signature on the Saint Lawrence Construction (SSLC), a consortium comprised of SNC-Lavalin inc., Flatiron Constructors Canada, Dragados USA and EBC, is mandated to build the New Champlain Bridge Corridor Project (NCBCP). Significant challenges include: Construction schedule: The Bridge must be in service by December 2018. Navigation restrictions: The Seaway traffic must be maintained during the main span’s construction. This paper discusses the following innovative construction methods used for the New Champlain Bridge (NCB): A custom-built gantry to install the precast footings/pier starters in the river; The delivery system for the segments to the tip of the deck in the main span. These erection systems were developed and selected to suit the specific challenges of the project, including speed of construction, maintenance of shipping and environmental protection areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReportSame topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207