MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2937339575 · doi:10.2749/vancouver.2017.2098

Innovative Means and Methods for the New Champlain Bridge

2017· article· en· W2937339575 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReport · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)Precast concreteEngineeringSpan (engineering)ScheduleCivil engineeringComputer scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Signature on the Saint Lawrence Construction (SSLC), a consortium comprised of SNC-Lavalin inc., Flatiron Constructors Canada, Dragados USA and EBC, is mandated to build the New Champlain Bridge Corridor Project (NCBCP). Significant challenges include:</p><ol><li> <p>Construction schedule: The Bridge must be in service by December 2018.</p></li><li> <p>Navigation restrictions: The Seaway traffic must be maintained during the main span’s construction.</p></li></ol><p>This paper discusses the following innovative construction methods used for the New Champlain Bridge (NCB):</p><ol><li> <p>A custom-built gantry to install the precast footings/pier starters in the river;</p></li><li> <p>The delivery system for the segments to the tip of the deck in the main span.</p></li></ol><p>These erection systems were developed and selected to suit the specific challenges of the project, including speed of construction, maintenance of shipping and environmental protection areas.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it