Obtención y Análisis del Modelo Dinámico del Sistema de Levitación Magnética: Anillo de Thomson
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este trabajo se muestra el desarrollo y analisis del modelo dinamico del Anillo de Thomson, esto se realiza tomando en consideracion el impacto del cambio de la posicion del anillo en los parametros electricos y magneticos. Se utiliza el metodo de elemento finito para determinar el campo magnetico y se realiza la estimacion algunos parametros, se simula el sistema de levitacion magnetica a diferentes niveles de excitacion para analizar el comportamiento de la posicion del anillo y se validan los resultados con experimentos, demostrando que se puede modelar el sistema completo sin necesidad de hacer las suposiciones clasicas que simplifican el analisis. El objetivo de realizar un modelo dinamico relativamente mas completo es el de poder disenar mejores estrategias de control para las diferentes aplicaciones que se le puede dar en los sistemas que funcionan con levitacion magnetica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".