CT of Kidney Volume in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Accuracy, Reproducibility, and Radiation Dose
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Total kidney volume (TKV) assessment is valuable in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) but the reference standard method of MRI planimetry requires access to MRI and time-consuming interpretation. Purpose To determine whether accurate TKV measurements comparable to the resource-intensive reference standard of MRI planimetry can be obtained by using alternate methods including dose-reducing CT protocols and time-saving measurement equations. Materials and Methods In this prospective study conducted September 2016 to June 2017, adult participants with ADPKD underwent one MRI and two CT examinations. Low-dose (LD) and ultra-low-dose (ULD) CT examinations were performed with radiation doses 1.4 and 2.6 times lower, respectively, than the authors’ institution’s standard abdomen and pelvis CT. ULD CT examinations were reconstructed via model-based iterative reconstruction. Three TKV measurement equations were applied to all image sets, and MRI manual planimetry was the reference standard. Spearman correlation with the reference standard, simple linear regression, and root mean square error (RMSE) calculation analyzed accuracy of these methods; intraclass correlation coefficient examined reproducibility. Results Thirty participants (mean age, 41 years; age range, 24–67 years) had a mean TKV of 1368.9 mL ± 1146.13 (standard deviation). The ULD and LD CT protocols had median dose-length product of 58.8 and 115.5 mGy ∙ cm, respectively (P = .01), and CT dose index of 1.2 and 3.9 mGy, respectively (P < .001). All imaging modalities and measurement equations had excellent correlation with the reference standard (r2 > 0.98). RMSE ranged from 80.5 to 157.3 mL (5.9%–11.5% of mean TKV). Intraclass correlation coefficients were greater than 0.98 for all methods. Mean measurement times for the ellipsoid method ranged from 4.6 to 5.2 minutes compared with a mean of 27.7 minutes (range, 14–60 minutes) for manual planimetry. Conclusion Accurate and reproducible total kidney volume measurements comparable to the reference standard of MRI planimetry can be obtained by using a dose-minimizing ultra-low-dose CT protocol and volume measurement based on discrete linear measurements. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".