MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2937614439 · doi:10.3917/commu.104.0149

Le droit à l’oubli : vers un nouveau droit fondamental de l’individu ?

2019· article· fr· W2937614439 on OpenAlexaff
Marie Ranquet

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceFreedom of expressionPhilosophyLawHuman rights

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le droit à la protection de la vie privée s’est mis en place progressivement au cours du xx e siècle. À partir des années 1970, la notion de protection de la vie privée s’amalgame de plus en plus à celle de protection des données à caractère personnel. Celle-ci trouve une traduction juridique dans la réglementation européenne (directive 95/46/CE en 1995, puis RGPD en 2016). Déplacée sur le terrain de l’informatique et des libertés, la question de la protection juridique de la vie privée se teinte d’une revendication nouvelle, celle du droit à l’oubli, qui se heurte parfois à la liberté d’expression ou à la liberté d’écrire l’histoire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.034
Scholarly communication0.0110.012
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationsSame topicPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionFrench-language works237,207