MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2937752358 · doi:10.5194/acp-2019-206

Evidence from IASI of a speeding up in stratospheric O <sub>3</sub> recovery in the Southern Hemisphere contrasting with a decline in the Northern Hemisphere

2019· article· en· W2937752358 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Catherine Wespes, Daniel Hurtmans, Simon Chabrillat, Gaétane Ronsmans, Cathy Clerbaux, Pierre‐François Coheur

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesEuropean Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological SatellitesEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesEuropean Space Agency
KeywordsStratosphereEnvironmental scienceClimatologyOzone layerAtmospheric sciencesTroposphereLatitudeSouthern HemisphereOzoneNorthern HemisphereQuasi-biennial oscillationOzone depletionTropicsMeteorologyGeographyGeologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. In this paper, we present the global fingerprint of recent changes in the mid-upper stratospheric (MUSt; > 25 hPa) ozone (O3) in comparison with the lower stratospheric (LSt, 150–25 hPa) O3 derived from the first 10 years of the IASI/Metop-A satellite measurements (January 2008–December 2017). The IASI instrument provides vertically-resolved O3 profiles with very high spatial and temporal (twice daily) samplings, allowing to monitor O3 changes in these two regions of the stratosphere. By applying multivariate regression models with adapted geophysical proxies on daily mean O3 time series, we discriminate anthropogenic trends from various modes of natural variability, such as the El Niño/Southern Oscillation – ENSO. The representativeness of the O3 response to its natural drivers is first examined. One important finding relies on a pronounced contrast between a positive LSt O3 response to ENSO in the extra-tropics and a negative one in the tropics, with a delay of 3 months, which supports a stratospheric pathway for the ENSO influence on lower stratospheric and tropospheric O3. In terms of trends, we find an unequivocal O3 recovery from the available period of measurements in winter/spring at mid-high latitudes for the two stratospheric layers sounded by IASI (>∼35° N/S in the MUSt and >∼45° S in the LSt) as well as in the total columns at southern latitudes (>∼45° S) where the increase reaches its maximum. These results confirm the effectiveness of the Montreal protocol and its amendments, and represent the first detection of a significant recovery of O3 concurrently in the lower, in the mid-upper stratosphere and in the total column from one single satellite dataset. A significant decline in O3 at northern mid-latitudes in the LSt is also detected, especially in winter/spring of the northern hemisphere. Given counteracting trends in LSt and MUSt at these latitudes, the decline is not categorical in total O3. When freezing the regression coefficients determined for each natural driver over the whole IASI period but adjusting a trend, we calculate a significant speeding up in the O3 response to the decline of O3 depleting substances (ODS) in the total column, in the LSt and, in a lesser extent, in the MUSt, at high southern latitudes over the year. A significant acceleration of the O3 decline at northern mid-latitudes in the LSt and in the total column is also highlighted over the last years. That, specifically, needs urgent investigation for identifying its exact origin and apprehending its impact on climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→French-language works237,207→