Mass Spectrometry-Based Quantification of Tau in Human Cerebrospinal Fluid Using a Complementary Tryptic Peptide Standard
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here, we report a method for the generation of complementary tryptic (CompTryp) isotope-labeled peptide standards for the relative and absolute quantification of proteins by mass spectrometry (MS). These standards can be digested in parallel with either trypsin (Tryp-C) or trypsin-N (Tryp-N), to generate peptides that significantly overlap in primary sequence having C- and N-terminal arginine and lysine residues, respectively. As a proof of concept, an isotope-labeled CompTryp standard was synthesized for Tau, a well-established biomarker in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), which included both N- and C-terminal heavy isotope-labeled (15N and 13C) arginine residues and flanking amino acid sequences to monitor proteolytic digestion. Despite having the exact same mass, the N- and C-terminal heavy Tau peptides are distinguishable by retention time and MS/MS fragmentation profiles. The isotope-labeled Tau CompTryp standard was added to human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) followed by parallel digestion with Tryp-N and Tryp-C. The native and isotope-labeled peptide pairs were quantified by parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) in a single assay. Notably, both tryptic peptides were effective at quantifying Tau in human CSF, and both showed a significant difference in CSF Tau levels between AD and controls. Treating these CompTryp Tau peptide measurements as independent replicates also improved the coefficient of variation and correlation with Tau immunoassays. More broadly, we propose that CompTryp standards can be generated for any protein of interest, providing an efficient method to improve the robustness and reproducibility for MS analysis of clinical and research samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".